01
Decision-grade scoping
Expected value, assumptions, Go or No-Go criteria, main risks and initial scope clearly stated.
New Services · AI · Cyber
From scoping to go-live, we integrate application services and supervised AI components into the existing system. Guardrails, traceability, human oversight and a passage to operation prepared at design stage.
Symptoms
Without Go/No-Go milestones, without real value measurement, the prototype drags on indefinitely without ever becoming operational.
Without architecture, without guardrails, without production monitoring: the prototype quickly becomes additional debt for the teams.
AI Act, GDPR, NIS2: caught up on urgently at the end of the project, they block production releases and force redesigns.
Underestimated interfaces, no runbook, undesignated owners: the service reaches production without anyone having prepared its life beyond.
What we deliver
01
Expected value, assumptions, Go or No-Go criteria, main risks and initial scope clearly stated.
02
Technical choices, IS integrations, observability, security, logging and compliance constraints made explicit.
03
A delivered, tested scope that can actually go live, not just a prototype or an isolated demo.
04
Runbook, owners, alerting, maintenance and MCC scope. The transition to operations is prepared before go-live.
AI under control
AI is not an add-on. It is an architectural decision : where the data flows, how the model is bounded, who monitors drift, how updates are governed. Four technical invariants follow.
Your data never feeds public model training. Complete isolation, infrastructure under your control.
Filters preventing the model from revealing confidential data or drifting. Bounded and auditable behaviour.
Model governance, drift monitoring, update management over time. The model stays under control in production.
AI Act, GDPR, NIS2 treated as architecture constraints from the design stage.
General framework: Controlled AI, our doctrine for engineering AI systems in real-world environments.
Proof in production
Build subjects are only worth their integration into the existing IS and their operability after go-live.
Energy & Professional Networks
Full information system for the habitA+ association, which has run the PG (Professionnels du Gaz) certification programme for 15 years. Business tools for the labelling and monitoring of 10,600 certified companies, embedded e-learning, and a real-time matching platform between professionals and consumers. Programme members: GRDF, ENGIE, EDF, Butagaz, Antargaz and biomethane stakeholders.
Research, innovation & tech transfer
SEVille PUI steering platform for Erganeo (Paris-region SATT involved in the France 2030 programme) and its five founding institutions. Multi-institution data consolidation, ANR campaign reliability and shared hub indicators, in a sovereign environment federated on each institution's existing identity.
By adopting a sovereign RAG architecture (your data never trains public models), guardrails that bound model behaviour, and an LLMOps framework that monitors drift in production.
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) connects an LLM to your document base without exposing your data. 'Sovereign' means the infrastructure remains under your control: no calls to third-party APIs, complete isolation.
By treating them as architecture constraints from the scoping phase: AI risk classification, data minimisation, automated decision logging, access controls, not as a checklist added before go-live.
Three recurring causes: no clear Go/No-Go milestones, regulatory compliance addressed at the end of the project, and underestimated interfaces with existing systems. Our 5-phase trajectory addresses each of these.
A useful scoping phase must support a launch, an adjustment or a stop decision. We deliver operable objectives, the target architecture, compliance constraints, the scope of the first increment and the go-live plan.
An argued No-Go beats an endless project. A 30-minute conversation is enough to know.
Challenge my project